Tom Brady has been hanging out in the Jake Paul orbit lately, which is its own kind of headline. But his football résumé is supposed to be untouchable. Seven rings. Five Super Bowl MVPs. The kind of longevity that broke the sport. So when NFL analyst Chris Simms ranked Brady ninth on his list of quarterbacks in their prime, the reaction was immediate and loud.
Simms laid out his top 10 on The Dan Patrick Show, and it didn’t take long for the debate to catch fire. His top five: Peyton Manning, Patrick Mahomes, Aaron Rodgers, John Elway and Brett Favre. The next five: Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, Dan Marino, Brady and Roger Staubach. That puts Brady not just behind Manning and Mahomes but also behind Allen and Jackson, two active QBs who haven’t won a ring.
“There’s certain guys where I’d go, ‘Yeah this guy’s career was better, but in their prime – in a 6, 7, 8 year window – I’d take this other guy over him,’” Simms said. That’s the whole argument in a nutshell. He’s not ranking careers. He’s ranking the six-to-eight-year peak.
Where Brady’s prime actually sits
An NFL quarterback’s prime usually falls between ages 26 and 33, with a statistical peak around 28 to 30. Brady’s prime window, by that definition, runs from 2007 to 2017. He’d already won three Super Bowls with the Patriots by that point, in 2002, 2004 and 2005. But from 2007 on, his numbers went to another level.
In 2007 he threw for 4,800 yards and a then-record 50 touchdowns, winning his first MVP. Three years later he became the first unanimous MVP in league history, posting 36 touchdowns. And in 2017, at age 40, he led that 28-3 comeback against Atlanta in Super Bowl LI and won another MVP with 4,577 yards. That’s a pretty outrageous prime for anyone.
But here’s the thing about Brady’s career. It’s so long and so consistent that his prime is unusually hard to pin down. He won a Super Bowl at 43. He led the league in passing yards at 44. His statistical peak overlaps with his championship peak in a way that almost no other quarterback can claim. Simms seems to be weighting raw physical tools and peak-season dominance over sustained greatness, which is a defensible approach if you’re talking about a six-year window. It just feels weird to see the guy with seven rings at No. 9.
The internet, predictably, had thoughts. Some fans pointed out that Manning’s prime includes some brutal playoff exits. Others noted that Mahomes is still building his prime while Brady closed his career as a top-tier starter. Simms, for what it’s worth, has never been afraid to make contrarian rankings. He caught grief a few years ago for putting Mahomes over Brady before Mahomes had won anything. That call aged pretty well.
Whether you think Brady belongs higher or lower, the ranking forces a useful distinction between who had the best career and who was most dangerous during their best stretch. Those are two different conversations. Simms just picked a side.
Leave a Comment